Antifa invades the Capitol

It was antifa that invaded the Capitol. Don't believe everything you hear.

What you won't hear from the media is that antifa assaulted the Capitol building in disguise. And that the police let in everyone else. The crowd calls out ANTIFA: Trump Supporters Stop 'Antifa' From Breaking Into Capitol

See more antifa: Antifa Identified at DC Capitol Acting as a Trump Supporter

And antifa admits breaching the Capitol with pride!:

Antifa Thug Admits and Brags About Storming DC Capitol Buildings

The DC mayor kept the national guard out and the Capitol police was video recorded inviting everyone in to create the false narrative of an insurrection: ShortURL - URL Shortener

In other video, trained wall climbers are seen. Most likely connected to antifa training.

Never believe what you are told or even a couple of carefully snapped images for photo ops. Always look for the evidence first. Look for video and data analytics. 

6 Jan 2021

 To my Texas Senators:

I am disappointed in the Senate's conduct on Jan 6 2021:

1) Every senator failed to both consider and speak on the evidence for election fraud, including you.

2) There were NOT objections to ALL 6 swing states

3) No effort was made to call out antifa for the capitol building assault or the role of police in letting everyone else in,

4) No effort was made to advocate for election integrity with solid election reform (they will steal your seat the same way next time),

5) McConnell was NOT called out for failing to select senators to speak on evidence supporting the objections,

6) You did not hold a press conference afterwards calling out McConnell for denying you the chance to speak on election fraud evidence.

 

Congress and the presidency will remain blue until significant election integrity reforms are put into place.  We are a Banana Republic and the 2020+ elections are illegitimate.  You need to reveal the fraud and call out our election insecurity.  Democrats may allow token election reforms but nothing to challenge their power to fully control America.  Now is the time to act with courage, if this Republic is to be saved.

Democrats attack Gender in House rules

Democrats have attacked gender in the halls of congress by banning all words referencing gender; they are no longer allowed: mother, father, man, woman, brother, sister, etc.

Democrats push back that this ban only affects the House rules document, but it leaves much room for asking why and what's next?  Surely they are simply testing the waters for more gender-hating Progressivism.

Democrats attack Democracy

Fascist Democrats have attacked the capitol building by using antifa posing as Trump supporters.  Then they encouraged everyone to enter.

After the antifa assault, the cops were told to let everyone into the capitol building.  The cops admit as much in this brief clip. https://rumble.com/vcjxnp-shocking-new-video-capitol-police-appear-to-just-let-protesters-into-buildi.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=8

It was ANTIFA

Here they are.

And antifa admits it with pride!

The Democrats knew, approved and organized it all!  Including the DC mayor who stopped the national guard for many hours.

The Gravity of Physics

Consideration of the number of dimensions of known space and weighted orthogonality of those dimensions proposed in string theory, the issue of gravity helps to resolve several dilemmas in physics.

For the average person, physics has long had an issue with unifying the very "small" laws of quantum physics with the very "large" laws of the universe and gravity.  The desire for a unified theory is justified by a desire to accurately and correctly explain anything with a single law before it has ever been observed.  It also allows us to understand the nature of everything and to form the correct understanding of their relationships.

Engineers have faced a similar issue with requiring experimental evidence to discover the dominant forces of a system in order to simplify the calculations to solvable problems.  It turns out that in every situation some forces/effects or so much stronger than the rest, that we can safely ignore the rest and get extremely accurate results.  Unfortunately, ignoring insignificant forces makes it very difficult to understand the true nature of space, particles, energy, etc.

Astrophysicists have struggle for decades with the expansion of the universe and dark matter and dark energy.  This indicates that even using the laws that we have developed for a particular application, while ignoring lesser influences, our misunderstanding is great enough to lead our conclusions to great errors.  The benefit of a complete understanding seems to apply to every question which deviates significantly from our current solution sets, which is practically all new technology and research.

The traditional 4 dimensions of space, which consists of x, y, z, and t in cartesian coordinates develop the question: Is it possible for the current 3D model of space to include more dimensions?

Gravity is oftentimes compared to a membrane upon which masses may be placed.  The masses stretch the membranes downwards with steeper slopes closer to the masses, and continuing a long distance out.  Thus the membrane is another dimension.  But gravity is just another force created by the effect of matter by its very nature on each other.  How many other forces create dimensions also?  And what does this mean about dimensions or weighted dimensions like String Theory?

Success begins with good parenting

I know a great many parents who think that they are good parents.  Most people think they are good people despite their many flaws.

If your child:

Cannot appreciate both their father and their mother,
Cannot find peace and happiness continually,
Cannot eventually bless their spouse with peace and happiness continually,
Cannot forgive unconditionally, appreciate the good, hear different viewpoints, and stand with courage for goodness, then
You have failed as a parent in raising your child, and you have set them up to fail in raising their children.

If you are not inspiring those around you to be more forgiving, more peaceful, and more happy, then you are failing as a person.

DO NOT ACCEPT FAILURE.  Get up again, and be a success.  It has to start with someone, and that person might as well be you.  In fact, it MUST be you.  Then be the parent your children deserve and teach them to be the parent their children deserve.  And be sure to tap into divine power to maximize your effectiveness.

Defending Traditional Marriages

We all see marriages failing at alarming rates across the country, and we frequently blame various factors like money or cheating, but in taking a closer look, I am finding that the real reasons are actually much simpler, more intimate, and more difficult to admit. Ironically, despite what we have learned about affairs and abuse (to name a few), it is not men, but women who seem to be the primary cause of destroying relationships and marriages. As disturbing as that last statement may be, and the explanation to follow, it is equally empowering to look at the other side of that statement: It is women who have the greatest and primary power to make strong marriages, strong families, and happy husbands. While I am in no way justifying the abuses which men commit, I will now explain why it is that women are so much more important when it comes to strong and happy marriages/relationships.

Men are very simple and our needs and desires are also simple. We want women who loves us enough to inspire us to be our best selves.  This includes respecting women by saving sex for marriage and keep our marriages strong. By denying extramarital sex/fornication, and keeping it alive within marriage, women act as the gatekeepers of the family and of respect.  Men can undermine and attack these efforts, but the power rests with women.

When a woman perceives her man acting in ways which fall short of the levels of love or respect which she feels she deserves, then her love towards her man diminishes and her reaction determines the strength of the relationship.  If she withdraws, everything falls apart.  If she accepts disrespect, she becomes deeply resentful and angry over time.  If she invests in goodness, the man has the power to strengthen the relationship.

When a man perceives his woman acting in ways which fall short of the levels of love or respect which he feels he deserves, then he becomes immediately angry for a short period. If she becomes fairly "persuasive" and contrite, his anger will likely disappear much faster and he will likely accept the offering of intimacy.

So when you look at marriage, it becomes obvious that the greatest difficulty is in getting the woman to unconditionally forgive and love her man intimately, because the man is quite easily persuaded but the woman is not. As she resists the call to forgiveness, love, and intimacy, she sets the seeds for: anger, abuse, depression, poor work and spending habits, sexual affairs, separation, and divorce. As the man disrespects the women, he sets the seeds for her destruction through long-term resentment.  As resentment increases, it becomes increasingly difficult for the man to repent and improve the relationship which he has been investing in, and to trust renewed loyalty to the marriage. If the woman exercises her power to strengthen her marriage, and he is willing to trust her and change himself, there is much hope. Any change must be expected to continue for a while before either spouse should accept it as a new norm.  Trust increases the interest in pleasing the spouse.  The woman has the power to immediately turn the entire relationship around and strengthen the marriage very quickly. He may have some power to do the same, but the process is much slower, much more painful, and much more likely to fail if she denies him intimacy, love, and forgiveness for long.

Genesys Works and abortion

I had the privilege of working for Genesys Works this summer. Their program is quite good at taking high school seniors from failing schools and teaching them to be successful in corporate America. I also learned much from their program as I prepared for and taught their young professionals. We filled their days with fours hours of fun, learning, and practical development for the work place.

Unfortunately, there were full-time individuals who lost their initial vision and began a series of lies, condescension, and manipulations which undermined these efforts very quickly. They lost two IT instructors and several other instructors in Houston alone because of this. Through some very serious lies and the inability to communicate and resolve issues with both students and instructors, they suffered great losses very quickly through their summer program. Their first lie of the summer which I noticed was their claim that this was the first summer that the staffing agency Robert Half was used, a claim which RHT disputes. I still don't understand why they would lie about this. They continued the lies by asserting that the first IT instructor that they released actually left them without notice for another opportunity; he was in fact fired with less than a days notice. They lie to IT instructors about the reasons for releasing them from the contract, which reasons RHT also disputes. They lied about coming to an agreement with Robert Half that extra hours on their family night week had to be "smoothed over" into the next week to avoid paying over-time pay; Robert Half denies any knowledge of such an arrangement. I never got paid for those 6 hours and they are not sure if they are going to pay me for the time worked, which they required of me. They lied about awarding a contract completion bonus, because they are denying their contractors that bonus by releasing them early. Unfortunately, where there are many apparently lies, there are so many more hidden lies.

They advocate abortion very actively.  I did not agree to support them in advocating abortion, but they required it of me, and I of course refused.  I had told them repeatedly that if they turned the question to me that I would advocate the seriousness of the decision, the value of life, and the need to assume responsibility.  That is exactly what I did when they turned to me to sustain their pro-abortion recommendation to a student.  While they would cite other reasons, this was the actual reason they fired me.

I love many aspects of Genesys Works, and therefore hope they learn from these lessons, and quickly remove such unprofessional practices from their organization. This organization offers excellent opportunities for young people at the cost of pushing Progressivism, abortion. I wish them the best success in overcoming these challenges. God bless the human race. We certainly need it.

The power to say "no"

Consumers are becoming overwhelmed with the number of accounts, services, bills, and charges going online, each with their own account name and password. Companies are taking advantage of that by extracting unearned or unapproved fees without any recourse to consumers. It is legalized theft, and we need to get the law current enough with technology to stop the theft.

Companies have been an unethical trend of profit by fees without obtaining express consumer approval, which becomes even more problematic as electronic events instantly trigger these fees while paper bills are being replaced by e-bills. A lot of these changes are good, but they are creating a new paradigm where companies get to make money by charging consumers for services which they neither wanted nor needed. Technology has also made it possible to alert consumers to services and charges instantly. We need congress to force companies to immediately let consumers know about charges at least a day in advances of actually charging them, so that the charges may be declined. Consumers must be provided the opportunity to register their email or phone for text messages, so that they may see a pending service and decline it and the charge for at least 24 hours. If a company wants to charge a person for anything, they should obtain express approval for each charge, even if the charges are itemized and scheduled in a signed contract as the contract provisions will kick in if the charges are not met as agreed.

One example (of so many): A company charges a fee automatically via an electronic funds transfer. The consumer is unaware of this charge and therefore also unable to decline the services or charges, or to change the account from which the fees are paid. Even if the consumer had each paper for each summary of automated EFT charge (oftentimes doesn’t even exist in paper form) in a folder which they referred to daily, there would be dozens of automated bills to keep track of every day on top of their every day stresses, work, and other responsibilities. IF the congress could mandate that companies report their billing amount and due dates to a central database for each consumer to access and organize, that only would greatly reduce countless late payments, headaches, frustration, and anxiety for both consumers and businesses. This database would have to be accurate, up-to-date and reliable.

So, the company sends the EFT without the consumer’s immediate knowledge or express approval. The bank then processes the EFT without verifying with the consumer whether the company had the authorization to make that EFT charge, let alone to make any EFT charges at all. The bank accepts the charge without getting the customer’s approval. It then determines that there is not enough in the account and charges an over-the-balance fee, because the consumer did not know to transfer funds to the account to cover the EFT charge. The bank does not ask the consumer if they would accept the fee in exchange for covering the EFT charge. What can the bank do? It can instantly (thanks to technology) send an email or phone alert requesting permission to make the charge. The charge can remain pending until approval is obtained or until the bank declines it.

The power to say “no” is a freedom which protects us from thieves who would not allow us the power to say “no.” It should never cost a cent to refuse a charge or service, but a contract may as a result apply its own fees when that answer violates any part of it. For example, the termination of a contract brings an early termination fee. But that fee came by a consumer choice. In order to charge that fee, I believe that the consumer must be informed that their choice would incur that fee and allowed to avoid that fee by not making that choice. Again, the consumer must have the power to say “no” to ALL fees and services, even if saying “no” to one means that they will not say “no” to the other. They must also have the power to authorize the source of the payment each time. Even with automated bill payment, because the source account may need to be changed and the vendor may change the account or services details. Additionally, the consumer needs to know and approve transactions in the event that charges are not correct.

Technology is greatly accelerated and the law needs to keep up with how it changes our economic landscape or else thieves will destroy us and our economy using legally accepted mechanisms. Technology opens us to so many new connections that it is difficult to keep track of everything, and easy for thieves to take advantage of us. Please create some legislation to protect us from these thieves and protect our power to say “no.”

The Issue of Gays

Regarding gay rights and their social issues, I must first firmly declare that I have neither enmity nor prejudice toward any gay person or group simply because I have nothing at stake with this issue. To the gay defense, genetic attraction appears to be the strongest and most popular argument to support "equality." It seems to go like this: Due to a dominant gay gene, an individual naturally prefers mating with the same gender. If the gene idea proves to be incompatible with evolution, then we must turn to other arguments and accept that being gay is, in fact, a choice. Unless logic reveals that gays are naturally harmful to society, no part of that choice justifies prejudice. That said, unwelcome advances naturally burn bridges, and gays are also obligated to avoid all body language indicating even the desire for making such advances toward those who may not welcome them.

Given that evolution favors genes which produce strong offspring. The greater the chance of producing the greatest number and strength of offspring capable of also producing the greatest number and strength of offspring, the better the chance that those genes will continue to the next generation. The presence of any gene which reduces the strength or number of offspring, without making substantial contributions to some other important survival trait, should be expected to produce a genetic line which cannot compete with the others for resources and constitutes a smaller and smaller part of the population until it eventually dies off. Gay genes cannot compete with straight genes, even if those with straight genes are naturally compelled to support those with gay genes (despite evidence to the contrary in modern societies), because of the simply fact that gays tend to have fewer offspring and less ability to manage long-lasting, stable and healthy relationships while raising children. According to current statistics and recorded history, the gay gene distracts from creating large numbers of strong children in healthy families. Given that gays do not need marriage to commit to a lasting union, we may easily ask: How many gay couples have raised at least one successful child from birth to 18 years old within an official and stable "gay union?" I do not know of any to be honest, and if there have been any, the number is likely to be very small, even as a percentage of the known gay population alone. Even then, it is expected that such a gay family also contain at least one mother because the gene which makes the parents protective of their offspring would naturally require the mother to be part of the union for the sake of the children. Any gay gene must allow the influence of a straight gene, and a protective gene which includes the mother in the family union. Lacking a mother in the family, the genetic explanation fails.

While it is possible that one gender could become confused about his or her own gender identity and thus trigger the recessive same sex gene, even that implies that a choice was made to be gay, namely the choice to identify one's own gender as being of the opposite gender. Gender confusion appears to be more of a psychological issue than of a gene issue. I tend to prefer this explanation. Ironically, the preference of gays to engage in opposite gender role-playing seems to clearly testify a lack of gender confusion in at least one of the parties in their assumption of their own natural gender. It also reveals the presence and strength of the straight gene (which promotes attraction to individuals with key characteristics of the opposite gender). Lacking the gender confusion, we are left with simply the choice to find pleasure wherever we feel comfortable or able to obtain it. If the lack of female desire for sex drives men to find pleasure with other men, then we are left considering the reason for low libido levels in women and solutions to help them find as much pleasure as men. Similarly, if women seek other women because the male focus on penetration fails to pleasure women, then it would be no surprise that women would turn to other women to better meet their needs for pleasure. A solution for enabling men to meet those needs may certainly allow a women to find as much pleasure with a man as with any other woman.

The consideration of the gay issue naturally brings serious hygiene issues associated with activities associated with the anus. Given the importance of hygiene to health, consideration of this aspect may natural sicken the audience. Extremely poor hygiene both directly and integrally defines the typical gay lifestyle. This poor hygiene also dramatically increases the transmission risk of HIV and other very serious and even deadly diseases, such consideration is relevant to the merits of both evolution and the gene argument, and to consideration of the merits of the gay choice.

Whether gay or lesbian, the gene which is most plentiful dominates while the gene which is not perpetuated dies out, according to Darwinian evolution.  Evolution allows no room for the gay gene, as it intrinsically cannot be preserved, if it ever existed.  Thus homosexuality (like all other LGBT issues) falls to the psychological argument.

Which leads to the real gay issue: "gay marriage" and the rights of children to a traditional marriage with a father and a mother.